Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Artificial Intelligence–Based Scores (AI & ML)
Interactive worksheet14 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

AFNet AI Prediction Model (Paroxysmal AF Detection)

AFNet AI Prediction Model (Paroxysmal AF detection): explanation and context This tool provides two complementary approaches: (1) a CHARGE-AF–style clinical proxy estimator that uses demographic and common clinical predictors to compute an approximate probability of paroxysmal AF detection on prolonged monitoring, and (2) an optional slot to combine an external ECG-AI model probability (if you have a deployed ECG mod

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/14 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

AFNet AI Prediction Model (Paroxysmal AF detection): explanation and context This tool provides two complementary approaches: (1) a CHARGE-AF–style clinical proxy estimator that uses demographic and common clinical predictors to compute an approximate probability of paroxysmal AF detection on prolonged monitoring, and (2) an optional slot to combine an external ECG-AI model probability (if you have a deployed ECG model that returns a numeric probability). The clinical proxy implemented here is intentionally transparent and interpretable; it must be recalibrated to local populations before clinical use. Clinical risk models such as CHARGE-AF were developed to predict incident AF using simple clinical variables and remain widely used as a baseline comparator.

Recent electrocardiogram-based deep learning models (end-to-end ECG AI and convolutional networks) have shown promising performance for predicting current or future AF from ECG traces, but these require model weights and careful external validation before clinical deployment. If you possess the original AFNet / AF detection model weights or an API endpoint that returns a calibrated probability, integrate that into the ECG-AI slot: send the raw ECG trace to your model, receive probability, then replace the ensemble logic here with the published model's exact formula or calibrated stacking.

Evidence & references2 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    Alonso A et al. CHARGE-AF risk model (J Am Heart Assoc.

  2. Source 2

    — CHARGE-AF is a widely cited clinical predictor for incident AF. AFibNet / AFibNet-style convolutional ECG detection studies (implementation and example CNN architectures). End-to-end ECG deep neural network risk prediction of AF (recent deep-learning work showing ECG-AI potential). Note: I did not find a peer-reviewed model published under the exact name “AFNet” with publicly available coefficients; AFNET is also the name of the Atrial Fibrillation Network (research consortium) which runs AI/AF projects — if you have their published model file or reference, we can directly implement it and replace the proxy weights.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Reference

AI ECG Age Predictor Mortality Correlation Model

General
Interactive worksheet

ESC-AI HF Readmission Prediction Tool

Artificial Intelligence–Based Scores (AI & ML)
Reference

ML Cardiotoxicity Prediction CTRCD Calculator

General
Reference

AI CT Calcium Scoring Automation Index Acai Calculator

General
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.