Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Artificial Intelligence–Based Scores (AI & ML)
Interactive worksheet3 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

AI-ECG LV Dysfunction (Attia 2019) Calculator

AI-ECG Deep Learning Model for Left Ventricular Dysfunction — Explanation and Clinical Context This calculator implements the clinical screening logic described by Attia et al. (Nature Medicine 2019). The original model is a convolutional neural network trained on paired 12-lead ECG and echocardiogram pairs from tens of thousands of patients. The model was trained to detect reduced systolic function defined as left v

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/3 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

AI-ECG Deep Learning Model for Left Ventricular Dysfunction — Explanation and Clinical Context This calculator implements the clinical screening logic described by Attia et al. (Nature Medicine 2019). The original model is a convolutional neural network trained on paired 12-lead ECG and echocardiogram pairs from tens of thousands of patients. The model was trained to detect reduced systolic function defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35% using the ECG signal alone.

On an independent test set the investigators reported excellent discrimination (AUC ~0.93) with sensitivity approximately 86.3% and specificity approximately 85.7% for that outcome. The published model returns a continuous probability score; clinical use requires choosing an operating threshold to balance sensitivity and specificity for the intended screening setting. Because deploying the original DNN weights and reproducing inference requires the trained model files and runtime, this calculator instead accepts an AI-ECG probability score as input (0–100%) and uses the published sensitivity and specificity to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for a user-supplied prevalence (Bayes' theorem).

PPV and NPV depend strongly on underlying prevalence: in low-prevalence screening populations even a strong model will have modest PPV, while NPV remains high. Thus interpret results in the context of local prevalence and clinical assessment; a positive AI-ECG screen should prompt confirmatory echocardiography or cardiology referral rather than immediate treatment decisions. If you can supply locally estimated sensitivity/specificity (from local validation) these constants should replace the published values used here to improve precision.

If you want an integrated inference (model running on the server), provide the original model artifacts and runtime environment and we can discuss embedding real-time inference — note this requires compliance with licenses, data governance, and compute resources.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Attia ZI, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):70–74. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0240-2.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Reference

AI Echo LV Strain Prediction Model

General
Interactive worksheet

ESC-AI HF Readmission Prediction Tool

Artificial Intelligence–Based Scores (AI & ML)
Reference

AI ECG Age Predictor Mortality Correlation Model

General
Reference

AI TAVR Outcome Predictor In Hospital Mortality

General
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.