Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Reviewed formula4 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

Aortic Compliance Index (ACI) Calculator

Aortic Compliance Index (ACI): Explanation and Clinical Context The Aortic Compliance Index (ACI) represents the ability of the aorta to expand and contract with each cardiac cycle in response to changes in blood pressure. It reflects the elastic properties of the aortic wall and serves as a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness. The formula used is: ACI = Stroke Volume / Pulse Pressure where Stroke Volume (SV) is t

Interactive calculator

Clinical inputs

0/4 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Reviewed local calculationACI menggunakan stroke volume dibagi pulse pressure; bila PP kosong dihitung dari SBP−DBP.
Show formulaSV ÷ pulse pressure
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

Aortic Compliance Index (ACI): Explanation and Clinical Context The Aortic Compliance Index (ACI) represents the ability of the aorta to expand and contract with each cardiac cycle in response to changes in blood pressure. It reflects the elastic properties of the aortic wall and serves as a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness. The formula used is: ACI = Stroke Volume / Pulse Pressure where Stroke Volume (SV) is the volume of blood ejected from the left ventricle per beat, and Pulse Pressure (PP) is the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

A high ACI value indicates a more compliant (elastic) aorta, whereas a low ACI suggests increased arterial stiffness. Decreased aortic compliance is associated with aging, hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. Clinically, it has been correlated with increased left ventricular afterload, myocardial oxygen demand, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Normal values of ACI vary depending on population and measurement method, but typically range from 1.5 to 2.5 mL/mmHg in healthy adults. In echocardiographic studies, a reduced ACI has been independently associated with increased left ventricular mass and impaired diastolic function, especially in hypertensive patients.

Evidence & references2 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    - Chen CH, Ting CT, Lin SJ, et al. “Which arterial and cardiac parameters best predict left ventricular mass?” Circulation. 1998;98(5):422–428. - Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. 6th ed. CRC Press;

  2. Source 2

    - Cavalcante JL, Lima JAC, Redheuil A, Al-Mallah MH. “Aortic stiffness: current understanding and future directions.” J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(14):1511–1522.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Formula confidence

Reviewed locally

ACI menggunakan stroke volume dibagi pulse pressure; bila PP kosong dihitung dari SBP−DBP.

SV ÷ pulse pressure
On this pageCalculator Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

Extracellular Volume Fraction (ECV%) Calculator

Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Interactive worksheet

4D Flow MRI Helicity Index (HI) Calculator

Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Reference

LV RV Strain Gradient Calculator

General
Reference

Cta Plaque Volume Index Pvi Calculator

General
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.