Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Coronary Artery Disease Scores
Interactive worksheet7 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

CAD Consortium Score Calculator

CAD Consortium Score: Comprehensive Explanation and Clinical Context The CAD Consortium Score is a validated clinical tool developed to estimate the pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis in at least one major epicardial vessel) in patients with stable chest pain. It replaces older prediction models such as the Diamond–Forrester model, which consistently overestimated risk in the m

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/7 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

CAD Consortium Score: Comprehensive Explanation and Clinical Context The CAD Consortium Score is a validated clinical tool developed to estimate the pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis in at least one major epicardial vessel) in patients with stable chest pain. It replaces older prediction models such as the Diamond–Forrester model, which consistently overestimated risk in the modern era. Model Components The CAD Consortium Clinical Model integrates eight predictors: age, sex, chest pain type, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking status.

It generates a patient-specific probability that can be used to decide whether further testing (such as CT coronary angiography) is warranted. Interpretation - <5%: Low risk → No further testing; focus on prevention. - 5–15%: Borderline risk → Consider CTCA if symptoms persist. - 15–50%: Intermediate risk → CTCA recommended. - >50%: High risk → Consider invasive angiography or aggressive management. Clinical Significance Using the CAD Consortium Score allows for a more individualized, evidence-based evaluation of chest pain, minimizing unnecessary invasive testing and improving patient outcomes.

It is endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for the assessment of stable coronary syndromes.

Evidence & references4 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    Genders TSS et al. A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation and update of the Diamond–Forrester model. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(11):1316–1330.

  2. Source 2

    Genders TSS et al. Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of existing cohorts. BMJ. 2012;344:e3485.

  3. Source 3

    ESC 2019 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–477.

  4. Source 4

    Adamson PD et al. CAD Consortium models for stable chest pain: diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(25):2401–2408.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

ACS High Risk Feature Identification Tool

Coronary Artery Disease Scores
Interactive worksheet

NSTEMI Early Angiography Benefit Estimator Tool

Coronary Artery Disease Scores
Interactive worksheet

Long Term DAPT Extension Consideration Tool

Coronary Artery Disease Scores
Interactive worksheet

Bleeding Risk vs Ischemic Benefit DAPT Balance Tool

Coronary Artery Disease Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.