Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Interactive worksheet19 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

CMR Feature Tracking Dyssynchrony Index (CMR-FT DI) Calculator

Inputs for Systolic Dyssynchrony Index (SDI; time-to-peak based) CMR Feature Tracking Dyssynchrony Index: Explanation and Clinical Context Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) enables derivation of strain-time curves from standard SSFP cine images without additional tagging sequences. Mechanical dyssynchrony can be quantified in two complementary ways. First, a systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI)

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/19 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

Inputs for Systolic Dyssynchrony Index (SDI; time-to-peak based) CMR Feature Tracking Dyssynchrony Index: Explanation and Clinical Context Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) enables derivation of strain-time curves from standard SSFP cine images without additional tagging sequences. Mechanical dyssynchrony can be quantified in two complementary ways. First, a systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) is calculated as the standard deviation of segmental time-to-peak (TTP) strain across the left ventricular model (commonly 16 segments).

Reporting SDI in milliseconds and normalized to the RR interval (% of cardiac cycle) captures absolute and relative temporal dispersion of contraction; lower SDI indicates more synchronous activation. A second, publication-derived approach focuses on the anteroseptal–posterior wall radial delay at the mid-ventricular level. This FT-CMR measure mirrors a validated speckle-tracking echocardiography paradigm and has shown good correlation with echo in diverse QRS durations; a delay ≥130 ms has been used as a dyssynchrony threshold in CRT studies.

Beyond TTP dispersion, frequency-domain metrics like the circumferential uniformity ratio estimate (CURE) summarize synchrony on a 0–1 scale (1 = perfectly synchronous) and demonstrate good inter-study reproducibility; however, CURE requires access to the full strain waveform and specialized processing, so it is not implemented in this simplified calculator. Clinical significance. CMR-FT dyssynchrony assessment can supplement QRS width and scar characterization in CRT work-ups and in research on myocardial discoordination.

While FT-CMR agrees with echocardiographic measures for more marked dyssynchrony and offers high image quality, variability for subtle dyssynchrony and intervendor differences mean values should be interpreted within clinical context and, when feasible, together with scar burden and electrical patterns.

Evidence & references3 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    Onishi T, et al. Feature tracking measurement of dyssynchrony from CMR cine acquisitions: comparison with echocardiographic speckle tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:95. Key finding: FT-CMR radial anteroseptal–posterior delay correlated with echo; ≥130 ms used as dyssynchrony threshold. Kowallick JT, et al. Quantitative assessment of LV mechanical dyssynchrony based on standard cine images: inter-study reproducibility of CMR-FT dyssynchrony indices (including SDI and CURE). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson / JCMR abstracts & SAGE. 2016–2017. Bilchick KC, et al. Circumferential uniformity ratio estimate (CURE) from MR tagging predicts CRT response (0–1 scale; higher = more synchronous). JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.

  2. Source 2

    Rahman ZU, et al. Feature tracking CMR overview: strain definitions and methodology. World J Cardiol.

  3. Source 3

    Helm RH, et al.; Rajiah P, et al. Uniformity ratio estimates and general MRI dyssynchrony concepts (CURE/RURE) and definitions of SD of TTP as dyssynchrony. Circulation 2005; RadioGraphics 2021.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Reference

Pet Fdg Uptake Ratio Myocarditis Activity Calculator

General
Interactive worksheet

Vascular Remodeling Radiomic Risk Model (FRP) Calculator

Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Interactive worksheet

4D Flow MRI Helicity Index (HI) Calculator

Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Interactive worksheet

LV Sphericity Index (MRI-Derived) Calculator

Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.