Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Reviewed formula4 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

E/e’ Average Calculator

E/e' Ratio: Explanation and Clinical Context The E over e prime ratio is one of the most widely used echocardiographic indices to estimate left ventricular filling pressure. The E wave represents early diastolic transmitral flow velocity which increases when the left atrial pressure rises. The e prime velocity is measured at the mitral annulus and reflects the intrinsic rate of myocardial relaxation. Since e prime de

Interactive calculator

Clinical inputs

0/4 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Reviewed local calculationTransmitral E velocity dibagi rerata mitral annular e′.
Show formulaE velocity ÷ average e′ velocity
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

E/e' Ratio: Explanation and Clinical Context The E over e prime ratio is one of the most widely used echocardiographic indices to estimate left ventricular filling pressure. The E wave represents early diastolic transmitral flow velocity which increases when the left atrial pressure rises. The e prime velocity is measured at the mitral annulus and reflects the intrinsic rate of myocardial relaxation.

Since e prime decreases in impaired relaxation, a high E over e prime ratio indicates that transmitral flow is disproportionately elevated relative to the relaxation capacity of the ventricle. As a result, the ratio serves as a surrogate marker of elevated left ventricular filling pressure. The average e prime value obtained from both the septal and lateral mitral annulus is recommended because it improves the accuracy and reduces the variability that may be encountered when a single site is used.

An E over e prime ratio below fourteen is generally considered normal in adults. Values of fourteen or higher suggest increased filling pressures. This threshold is supported across major clinical guidelines and has been validated in diverse populations including patients with heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, and ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Clinically, the E over e prime ratio plays a central role in the evaluation of diastolic function. It is particularly useful in patients with preserved ejection fraction where symptoms may be present despite normal systolic performance. When interpreted together with additional parameters such as mitral inflow pattern, pulmonary vein flow, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and left atrial volume index, it contributes to the comprehensive classification of diastolic dysfunction severity.

This parameter is also relevant during stress echocardiography. An abnormal increase in E over e prime during exercise suggests impaired left ventricular compliance and can help confirm the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. In acute care settings, the ratio assists clinicians in differentiating cardiac from non cardiac causes of dyspnea.

The interpretation of E over e prime should always be integrated with the entire clinical context. Factors such as significant mitral annular calcification, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valves, regional wall motion abnormalities, or tachycardia can affect the accuracy of measurements. When these limitations are present, alternative indices or invasive hemodynamic assessment may be required.

Reference Nagueh SF et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.

2016. Ommen SR et al. Clinical Utility of Doppler Echocardiography and Tissue Doppler Imaging in the Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures.

Circulation. 2000. Marwick TH et al.

Diastolic Stress Testing. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017.

Yancy CW et al. 2022 AHA Scientific Statement on Heart Failure. American Heart Association.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(4):277–314. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011. Open source

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Formula confidence

Reviewed locally

Transmitral E velocity dibagi rerata mitral annular e′.

E velocity ÷ average e′ velocity
On this pageCalculator Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

Cornell Voltage Duration Product Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

LV Diastolic Dysfunction Grade (ASE 2016) Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

T1/T2 Mapping Index Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

RA Area Index Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.