Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet8 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

EMPEROR-Preserved Benefit Stratification Index

— Explanation and Clinical Context This tool is an approximate, transparent calculator that estimates the expected absolute benefit (absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat) from empagliflozin for the EMPEROR-Preserved primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death or first hospitalization for heart failure) over a follow-up period consistent with the trial (median 26.2 months). The EMPEROR-Preserved rand

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/8 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet for structured input capture, review, copying, and export on this device. It deliberately makes no numerical or evidence claim without a reproducible primary source.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

EMPEROR-Preserved Benefit Stratification Index — Explanation and Clinical Context This tool is an approximate, transparent calculator that estimates the expected absolute benefit (absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat) from empagliflozin for the EMPEROR-Preserved primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death or first hospitalization for heart failure) over a follow-up period consistent with the trial (median 26.2 months). The EMPEROR-Preserved randomized trial (n=5,988) reported a primary outcome occurrence of 17.1% in the placebo group and 13.8% in the empagliflozin group over a median follow-up of 26.2 months, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69–0.90). The trial benefit was driven primarily by fewer heart failure hospitalizations.

This calculator either accepts a clinician’s measured estimate of a patient’s baseline 2.2-year risk (preferred) or produces a pragmatic baseline risk estimate by adjusting the trial placebo rate with simple multipliers for common risk markers (age, LVEF, diabetes status, eGFR, recent HF hospitalization). These multipliers are intentionally conservative and approximate — they are not a fully validated prognostic model. The treated risk is then estimated by applying the trial HR (0.79) to the baseline risk to produce an estimated treated cumulative incidence; ARR and NNT are calculated from those values.

Use these outputs as an aid to shared decision-making and resource prioritization; they are not a substitute for individualized clinical assessment or a replacement for validated risk models tailored to a patient cohort. References Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction.

N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1451–1461. (Primary EMPEROR-Preserved trial; reported primary outcome: placebo 17.1% vs empagliflozin 13.8%; HR 0.79). Filippatos G, Butler J, et al.

Empagliflozin for Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction With and Without Diabetes — subgroup and prespecified analyses. (See EMPEROR subgroup analyses and extended data for effect modification by LVEF and other variables.) Note: No published score named "EMPEROR-Preserved Benefit Stratification Index" could be found in the trial publications or subsequent indexed analyses as of the consulted literature search; this calculator therefore implements a transparent, reproducible approximation built from the trial’s reported event rates and hazard ratio.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet for structured input capture, review, copying, and export on this device. It deliberately makes no numerical or evidence claim without a reproducible primary source.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

CATCH-HF Hospitalization Predictor

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

ESC ICD Primary Prevention Criteria Algorithm

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

DAPT-CHF Subgroup Analysis Index Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

THEMIS-PCI Benefit vs Bleeding Algorithm

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
This active worksheet captures and exports structured inputs locally. It does not assert a numerical formula or evidence claim without a reproducible primary source.