Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet1 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) Calculator

Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS): Explanation and Clinical Context Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by speckle-tracking echocardiography measures the percentage deformation (shortening) of the left ventricular myocardium in the longitudinal direction during systole. GLS is reported as a negative percentage (for example, −20% represents greater shortening than −15%) and is a sensitive measure of longitudinal systolic

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/1 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS): Explanation and Clinical Context Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by speckle-tracking echocardiography measures the percentage deformation (shortening) of the left ventricular myocardium in the longitudinal direction during systole. GLS is reported as a negative percentage (for example, −20% represents greater shortening than −15%) and is a sensitive measure of longitudinal systolic function that often detects subclinical dysfunction earlier than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). GLS values vary by vendor, software version, age, sex, and loading conditions; therefore comparisons should ideally be performed with the same acquisition and analysis pipeline.

Contemporary guideline/consensus thresholds commonly used in adults designate GLS magnitude >18% (i.e., GLS < −18%) as normal, 16–18% as borderline, and <16% (i.e., GLS > −16%) as abnormal or reduced — thresholds meant for clinical interpretation with the caveats noted above. Several large cohort studies and meta-analyses have shown that progressively less negative (worse) GLS is associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes (including mortality, heart failure hospitalization and cardiotoxicity), with many analyses reporting an approximate relative change in hazard per 1% absolute worsening of GLS (often in the range of ~4–12% per 1% depending on the cohort and endpoint). These associations support the complementary prognostic value of GLS beyond LVEF in multiple clinical settings, but absolute risk estimates should be individualized and used alongside clinical context, biomarkers, and other imaging parameters.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    American Society of Echocardiography / consensus and guideline statements on strain (normal GLS generally more negative than −18%; borderline −16% to −18%; abnormal less negative than −16%). Yingchoncharoen T, et al. Normal Ranges of Left Ventricular Strain: meta-analysis (reported pooled normal GLS ~ −19.7%). D’Elia N, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis / normal GLS distribution and age effects. Park JJ, et al. GLS predicts mortality: each 1% absolute change associated with ~5% relative change in mortality in multivariable models. Biering-Sørensen T, et al. GLS prognostic value in population cohorts (hazard ratio per 1% change reported in cohort studies).

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

LV Diastolic Dysfunction Grade (ASE 2016) Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

LGE Extent (% Myocardium Scarred) Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

LVOT VTI (Stroke Volume Estimate) Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

Extracellular Volume Fraction (ECV) by MRI Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.