Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet2 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

Gubner-Ungerleider Index (ECG LVH) Calculator

Gubner–Ungerleider Index — explanation and clinical context The Gubner–Ungerleider voltage index is an early electrocardiographic voltage criterion intended to detect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). It is calculated as the algebraic sum of the amplitude of the R wave in lead I plus the amplitude of the S wave in lead III (R(I) + S(III)). Classic sources and many contemporary reviews report a commonly used thresho

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/2 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet for structured input capture, review, copying, and export on this device. It deliberately makes no numerical or evidence claim without a reproducible primary source.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

Gubner–Ungerleider Index — explanation and clinical context The Gubner–Ungerleider voltage index is an early electrocardiographic voltage criterion intended to detect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). It is calculated as the algebraic sum of the amplitude of the R wave in lead I plus the amplitude of the S wave in lead III (R(I) + S(III)). Classic sources and many contemporary reviews report a commonly used threshold of >25 mm (≈2.5 mV) for suggesting LVH by this index.

The index historically demonstrates high specificity but low sensitivity compared with imaging-based standards (i.e., it misses many cases of anatomic LVH while a positive result increases the likelihood of true LVH). Clinically, a Gubner–Ungerleider-positive ECG should prompt consideration of imaging (echocardiography) for confirmation, and be interpreted in the context of clinical risk factors (hypertension, age, body habitus) and other ECG criteria (for example, Sokolow–Lyon and Cornell voltage criteria). This template uses inputs in millimetres (mm) — please convert from mV when required (1 mV = 10 mm).

Reference (original and key reviews): Gubner R, Ungerleider HE. Electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy: factors determining the evolution of the electrocardiographic patterns in hypertrophy and bundle branch block. Arch Intern Med.

1943;72:196–209. Additional evaluations, contemporary comparisons and performance data are reported in modern ECG-LVH accuracy studies and reviews (see references below).

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet for structured input capture, review, copying, and export on this device. It deliberately makes no numerical or evidence claim without a reproducible primary source.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Formula reviewed

Aortic Stiffness Index (ASI) Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

E/A Ratio Grading (Diastolic Function) Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) Estimate Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
Interactive worksheet

RV Fractional Area Change (FAC) Calculator

Cardiac Imaging Scores (ECHO, CT, MRI)
This active worksheet captures and exports structured inputs locally. It does not assert a numerical formula or evidence claim without a reproducible primary source.