Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Infective Endocarditis Scores
Interactive worksheet3 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

PET-CT Uptake Grading Score Calculator

PET-CT Uptake Grading Score: Explanation and Clinical Context The PET-CT Uptake Grading Score is used to quantify the metabolic activity of lesions relative to reference tissues (liver and blood pool) in FDG PET-CT imaging. Grade 0 indicates no significant uptake, Grade 1 indicates low uptake (above blood pool but below liver), Grade 2 indicates moderate uptake (equal to or above liver but less than twice liver SUVme

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/3 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

PET-CT Uptake Grading Score: Explanation and Clinical Context The PET-CT Uptake Grading Score is used to quantify the metabolic activity of lesions relative to reference tissues (liver and blood pool) in FDG PET-CT imaging. Grade 0 indicates no significant uptake, Grade 1 indicates low uptake (above blood pool but below liver), Grade 2 indicates moderate uptake (equal to or above liver but less than twice liver SUVmean), and Grade 3 indicates high uptake (>2 × liver SUVmean). This scoring system allows standardized interpretation of FDG avidity, useful for tumor characterization, treatment response assessment, and prognostic stratification.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Wahl RL, et al. “From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors.” J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1:122S-150S. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.057307

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

2023 Duke ISCVID Diagnostic Criteria for Infective Endocarditis Calculator

Infective Endocarditis Scores
Interactive worksheet

DeFeo Score (Surgical Indication Predictor) Calculator

Infective Endocarditis Scores
Interactive worksheet

PETIE Index (PET-based IE Probability) Calculator

Infective Endocarditis Scores
Interactive worksheet

Denes Prognostic Index (IE Mortality) Calculator

Infective Endocarditis Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.