Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet6 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

PFO Closure Risk (RoPE) Score Calculator

PFO Closure Risk (RoPE) Score: Explanation and Clinical Context The RoPE (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) score is a validated 10-point tool designed for patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke in whom a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is detected. It estimates how likely the index stroke is causally related to the PFO (rather than incidental) and contextualizes the expected 2-year recurrence risk under medical management

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/6 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

PFO Closure Risk (RoPE) Score: Explanation and Clinical Context The RoPE (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) score is a validated 10-point tool designed for patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke in whom a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is detected. It estimates how likely the index stroke is causally related to the PFO (rather than incidental) and contextualizes the expected 2-year recurrence risk under medical management. The score assigns points for younger age and the absence of vascular risk factors (no hypertension, no diabetes, nonsmoking), no prior stroke/TIA, and the presence of a cortical infarct on neuroimaging.

Higher scores (especially ≥7) indicate a higher probability that the stroke is PFO-related, whereas lower scores suggest the PFO is more likely incidental. Importantly, as the score increases the PFO-attributable fraction rises (approaching ~88% for scores 9–10), while the observed 2-year recurrence tends to be lower compared with low-score strata. These relationships reflect that patients whose index event is most plausibly PFO-mediated often have fewer competing stroke mechanisms and a relatively benign recurrence profile on medical therapy, whereas patients with low scores likely harbor non-PFO causes with higher recurrence.

The RoPE score does not incorporate anatomic PFO risk features (e.g., large right-to-left shunt or atrial septal aneurysm) or concurrent venous thromboembolism. For closure decision-making, many groups therefore pair RoPE with an anatomic/clinical framework (e.g., PASCAL) and randomized-trial evidence, integrating patient age, stroke mechanism work-up, PFO features, and bleeding/device considerations.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Kent DM, Ruthazer R, Weimar C, et al. An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology. 2013;81(7):619–625. PMC3775694. Thaler DE, Ruthazer R, Weimar C, et al. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Study. J Am Heart Assoc / Neurology-related consortium resources; overview and pooled database methods. 2012–2014. (See PMCID: PMC4060865; and related analyses). Thaler DE, Kent DM. Patient Selection for PFO Closure Based on the RoPE Study. Cardiac Interventions Today. 2014; March/April:60–65. (Explains Bayes approach and strata ranges 0%–88%). Kent DM, Mir H, et al. Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE)–Estimated Attributable Fraction and Treatment Benefit. Stroke. 2020;51: in press at time; demonstrates correlation of RoPE-estimated attributable fraction with closure benefit. NCBI Bookshelf. RoPE Score and PASCAL classifications – table synopsis of variables and interpretive ranges. Kim JS, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke. Korean Circ J. 2022; Table: PFO-attributable fraction and 2-year recurrence by RoPE strata (values used in this tool).

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Reference

France 2 Risk Model TAVR Calculator

General
Interactive worksheet

OBSERVANT TAVI Mortality Index Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

TAVR VARC-3 Classification Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

Catheter Ablation Success Predictor (APPLE & SUCCESS)

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.