Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Interactive worksheet3 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

Right Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain (RV-GLS) Calculator

Right Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain (RV-GLS): Explanation and Clinical Context RV-GLS quantifies right ventricular systolic deformation along the longitudinal axis from an RV-focused apical four-chamber view using 2D speckle-tracking. Two reporting conventions exist: a 6-segment global value that includes free wall and septum (RV-GLS), and a 3-segment free-wall-only value (RVFWLS). Because septal motion is i

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/3 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

Right Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain (RV-GLS): Explanation and Clinical Context RV-GLS quantifies right ventricular systolic deformation along the longitudinal axis from an RV-focused apical four-chamber view using 2D speckle-tracking. Two reporting conventions exist: a 6-segment global value that includes free wall and septum (RV-GLS), and a 3-segment free-wall-only value (RVFWLS). Because septal motion is influenced by LV mechanics and ventricular interdependence, RVFWLS is often more sensitive to intrinsic RV systolic performance, while RV-GLS integrates biventricular coupling effects.

Normal strain is more negative (greater shortening). The original NORRE dataset established sex- and method-specific lower-limit-of-normal (LLN) values: approximately −20% for RV-GLS and around −23% for RVFWLS (slightly more negative in women). Outcome studies across heart failure and cardiopulmonary cohorts consistently show that less negative RV strain conveys higher risk; pragmatic cut-points around −15% for RV-GLS and −18% for RVFWLS have been associated with increased mortality or adverse events.

However, technical factors (frame rate, image quality, foreshortening), hemodynamic loading (pulmonary pressures, RV afterload), and vendor-specific tracking differences can shift measured values. Therefore, interpretation should triangulate strain with conventional RV indices (TAPSE, S', FAC, 3D RVEF), right-sided pressures, and the clinical syndrome rather than relying on a single metric.

Evidence & references3 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    Muraru D, Onciul S, Peluso D, et al. Sex- and Method-Specific Reference Values for Right Ventricular Strain by 2-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(2):e003866. Lupi L, et al. Prognostic value of right ventricular longitudinal strain in heart failure: optimal cut-offs for RVFWLS (~−18%) and RV-GLS (~−15%). Heart Fail Rev.

  2. Source 2

    American Society of Echocardiography (ASE). Guidelines for the Echocardiographic Assessment of the Right Heart in Adults and Special Considerations in Pulmonary Hypertension. JASE.

  3. Source 3

    Additional contemporary reviews/meta-analyses corroborate method selection, acquisition, and prognostic use of RV strain in diverse populations.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Reference

Cta Plaque Volume Index Pvi Calculator

General
Interactive worksheet

LV Sphericity Index (MRI-Derived) Calculator

Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Interactive worksheet

Myocardial Work Efficiency Index (MWEI) Calculator

Radiology & Imaging–Omics Scores
Reference

Pet Fdg Uptake Ratio Myocarditis Activity Calculator

General
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.