Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet8 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

ROCKET-AF Heart Failure Subgroup Risk Index

— explanation and context This page presents an experimental composite index adapted to reflect the primary predictors and outcomes described in ROCKET-AF and its heart-failure subgroup analyses. The ROCKET-AF trial (rivaroxaban vs warfarin) enrolled a high-risk atrial fibrillation population and reported subgroup analyses examining outcomes among patients with heart failure, demonstrating that heart failure patients

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/8 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

ROCKET-AF Heart Failure Subgroup Risk Index — explanation and context This page presents an experimental composite index adapted to reflect the primary predictors and outcomes described in ROCKET-AF and its heart-failure subgroup analyses. The ROCKET-AF trial (rivaroxaban vs warfarin) enrolled a high-risk atrial fibrillation population and reported subgroup analyses examining outcomes among patients with heart failure, demonstrating that heart failure patients enrolled in ROCKET-AF had higher thromboembolic risk and different comorbidity profiles; renal dysfunction, prior stroke/TIA, and reduced left ventricular function were among factors associated with worse outcomes in subgroup reports. The index above assigns points to commonly reported adverse-outcome predictors (age ≥75, prior stroke/TIA, HF with reduced EF or advanced NYHA class, renal impairment, diabetes, hypertension, vascular disease, and persistent AF) to produce a simple summary score and illustrative risk bands.

This composite is provided solely to mirror the kinds of risk drivers described in ROCKET-AF subgroup publications and to help clinicians/learners explore how multiple risk factors combine in HF patients with AF. How to interpret this tool: The numeric score is an experimental summary of established predictors; the associated "risk band" is an approximate mapping for educational demonstration and should not be used as a validated probability of stroke, bleeding, or death. For clinical decision-making about anticoagulation or advanced therapies, use validated tools (e.g., CHA2DS2-VASc for stroke risk, validated bleeding scores), guideline recommendations, and individual patient assessment.

Evidence & references2 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981-992. (ROCKET-AF main trial). van Diepen S, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with heart failure and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: insights from ROCKET-AF. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(4):... (ROCKET-AF HF subgroup analysis). Singer DE, et al. Data From the ROCKET AF Clinical Trial: baseline characteristics and outcomes analyses. (ROCKET-AF dataset overview). Breithardt G, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes with rivaroxaban vs warfarin in ROCKET-AF: subgroup insights. Eur Heart J.

  2. Source 2

    Additional subgroup and outcomes analyses discussed in review and meta-analysis literature summarizing DOAC performance in HF subgroups.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

Emergency HF Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

BNP/NT-proBNP Ratio Index Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

HeartLogic Multisensor Algorithm (Approximate Calculator)

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

EchoCRT Non-response Risk Score Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.