Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Pediatric & Congenital Scores
Interactive worksheet2 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

Shunt Fraction Index (Qp:Qs) Calculator

Shunt Fraction Index (Qp:Qs Ratio): Explanation and Clinical Context The Qp:Qs ratio, also known as the Shunt Fraction Index, is used to quantify the magnitude of left-to-right cardiac shunts. It is defined as the ratio of pulmonary blood flow (Qp) to systemic blood flow (Qs). A Qp:Qs ratio of 1 indicates no shunt, while values above 1 indicate a left-to-right shunt, with higher values reflecting larger shunts. Clini

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/2 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

Shunt Fraction Index (Qp:Qs Ratio): Explanation and Clinical Context The Qp:Qs ratio, also known as the Shunt Fraction Index, is used to quantify the magnitude of left-to-right cardiac shunts. It is defined as the ratio of pulmonary blood flow (Qp) to systemic blood flow (Qs). A Qp:Qs ratio of 1 indicates no shunt, while values above 1 indicate a left-to-right shunt, with higher values reflecting larger shunts.

Clinical decision-making often relies on this ratio: small shunts (<1.5) usually do not require intervention, moderate shunts (1.5–2.0) require careful monitoring, and large shunts (>2.0) typically need surgical or catheter-based closure. This calculation can be derived from invasive cardiac catheterization measurements or non-invasively using echocardiography with Doppler data. Accurate measurement helps guide timing for intervention and assess the risk of complications such as pulmonary hypertension or ventricular volume overload.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2020). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:563-645. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

Aristotle Comprehensive Complexity (ACC) Calculator

Pediatric & Congenital Scores
Interactive worksheet

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) Calculator

Pediatric & Congenital Scores
Interactive worksheet

PDA Hemodynamic Significance Index (PDAsc) Calculator

Pediatric & Congenital Scores
Interactive worksheet

AVSD Surgical Mortality Score Calculator

Pediatric & Congenital Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.