Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet5 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

STOPDAPT-2 ACS Mortality Prediction Tool

: Explanation and Clinical Context The STOPDAPT-2 ACS trial evaluated an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategy (1–2 months followed by clopidogrel monotherapy) versus standard 12-month DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Although the primary endpoint did not demonstrate non-inferiority for the abbreviated therapy regarding the composi

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/5 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

STOPDAPT-2 ACS Mortality Prediction Tool: Explanation and Clinical Context The STOPDAPT-2 ACS trial evaluated an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategy (1–2 months followed by clopidogrel monotherapy) versus standard 12-month DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Although the primary endpoint did not demonstrate non-inferiority for the abbreviated therapy regarding the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or stent thrombosis, there is growing interest in refined risk stratification for mortality and bleeding in ACS populations. This tool aims to estimate 12-month mortality risk in ACS patients post-PCI by integrating clinical variables (age, renal function, left ventricular ejection fraction, Killip class, ST-segment deviation) that are commonly available early after intervention.

To use: input the required parameters and interpret the output as the approximate probability (%) of death within 12 months. Clinicians should use the result as an adjunct to—but not a substitute for—clinical judgement and guideline-directed therapy.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Watanabe H, et al. Comparison of clopidogrel monotherapy after 1 to 2 months of dual antiplatelet therapy with 12 months of DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the STOPDAPT-2 ACS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiology. 2022;7(4):407-417.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

RELAX-AHF Mortality Prediction Score Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

BNP/NT-proBNP Ratio Index Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

AFIRE Study Algorithm (AF + Stable CAD) Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

EchoCRT Non-response Risk Score Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.