Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet3 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

ADHERE Tree Model for Acute HF Mortality Calculator

ADHERE Classification and Regression Tree (CART) — explanation and clinical context The ADHERE CART is a simple bedside decision tree developed from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. The CART analysis identified three sequential admission variables that provided the best discrimination

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/3 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

ADHERE Classification and Regression Tree (CART) — explanation and clinical context The ADHERE CART is a simple bedside decision tree developed from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. The CART analysis identified three sequential admission variables that provided the best discrimination: admission blood urea nitrogen (BUN), admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), and serum creatinine. Specifically, the published branch points are BUN ≥ 43 mg/dL, SBP < 115 mmHg, and serum creatinine ≥ 2.75 mg/dL; using these splits the original derivation produced five terminal risk groups with predicted in-hospital mortality that ranged from approximately 2.1% (low risk) to 21.9% (high risk).

These thresholds permit rapid stratification at the bedside without calculator apps or complex scoring. Clinical interpretation: the ADHERE tree is intended as a pragmatic risk-stratification aid at hospital presentation. A patient with low BUN (<43 mg/dL) and SBP ≥115 mmHg is classified as low risk (predicted in-hospital mortality ≈ 2.1% in the original cohort), whereas the combination of high BUN (≥43), low SBP (<115) and markedly elevated creatinine (≥2.75) identifies the small high-risk subgroup with substantially higher observed mortality (≈21.9% in the derivation cohort).

Intermediate groups (for example BUN ≥43 but SBP ≥115, or BUN <43 but SBP <115) have intermediate predicted mortality (originally reported ~5.6% and ~4.9% respectively, and one intermediate node ~13.2%). These node probabilities were reported in ADHERE and reproduced in multiple external validations and comparisons. Limitations & recommended use: the ADHERE tree was derived from a large US registry and provides quick prognostic insight, but calibration and absolute probabilities vary by population and time: several validation studies found differences between predicted and observed mortalities and advise local validation before using the exact percentages to make treatment-limiting decisions.

Use clinical judgment—treat the ADHERE group as an adjunct (triage / escalation signal), not a replacement for bedside assessment or local prognostic models. For contemporary deployments, consider local recalibration (or use local registry estimates) if you require absolute probability precision.

Evidence & references2 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    Fonarow GC, et al. Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis. JAMA. 2005;293:572-580. Thakkar R, et al. Evaluation and external comparisons of the ADHERE CART in clinical trials and registries (discussion/validation literature). Crit Care / PubMed Central

  2. Source 2

    Marques I, et al. Predicted ADHERE risk versus observed mortality — external cohort comparisons and discussion on calibration. (PRECIC comparison / SSRN).

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

AHEAD Score (Acute HF Death Prediction) Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

EMPULSE Response Predictor (Empagliflozin in Heart Failure)

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

TRED-HF Recovery Relapse Prediction Model

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

SMART-CHOICE HF Subpopulation Algorithm

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.