Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet11 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

SMART-CHOICE HF Subpopulation Algorithm

— explanation and clinical context This tool classifies heart failure patients into subpopulations using commonly accepted left ventricular ejection fraction thresholds (HFrEF <41%, HFmrEF 41–49%, HFpEF ≥50%). It then provides directional prognostic information using two well-known validated frameworks as proxies: the MAGGIC risk framework for 1- and 3-year mortality, and the GWTG-HF model for in-hospital mortality r

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/11 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

SMART-CHOICE HF Subpopulation Algorithm — explanation and clinical context This tool classifies heart failure patients into subpopulations using commonly accepted left ventricular ejection fraction thresholds (HFrEF <41%, HFmrEF 41–49%, HFpEF ≥50%). It then provides directional prognostic information using two well-known validated frameworks as proxies: the MAGGIC risk framework for 1- and 3-year mortality, and the GWTG-HF model for in-hospital mortality risk. The MAGGIC and GWTG-HF models are validated prognostic tools developed from large international or registry cohorts and use multiple clinical variables (age, EF, NYHA, comorbidities, renal function, electrolytes, vital signs) to estimate mortality risk.

The outputs shown here are approximate because reproducing the exact original models requires the published coefficients/point tables; if you provide the SMART-CHOICE HF publication or coefficient table I will implement the exact original model to produce precise numeric risk predictions. Clinical interpretation summary: Use the LVEF-based subpopulation to guide phenotype-specific management (e.g., guideline-directed medical therapy and device considerations differ for HFrEF vs HFpEF). Use the approximate mortality categories here only as an initial orientation; confirm with validated calculators or original model output for individual patient decisions.

Evidence & references3 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    Meta-Analysis Global Group In Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score — development and validation of a multivariable risk model for mortality in heart failure. (See MAGGIC risk literature and validated calculators such as MDCalc.).

  2. Source 2

    Get With The Guidelines — Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score for in-hospital mortality. Original description and validation.

  3. Source 3

    I was unable to find a peer-reviewed publication describing a dedicated “SMART-CHOICE HF Subpopulation Algorithm” (search results for SMART-CHOICE mainly refer to antiplatelet SMART-CHOICE trials). If you have the SMART-CHOICE HF manuscript, supplementary material, or coefficient table, please paste it and I will implement the original model exactly.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

RALES Score (Spironolactone Benefit Predictor)

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

REVERSE Trial Responder Index Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

HF-CRT Echo Resynchronization Index Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

ROCKET-AF Heart Failure Subgroup Risk Index

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.