Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet6 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

CABANA AF Ablation Success (CAAP-AF) Calculator

CAAP-AF and CABANA: Explanation and Clinical Context The CAAP-AF score predicts rhythm success following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation by incorporating six baseline parameters: coronary artery disease, left atrial (LA) diameter, age, AF type (persistent vs paroxysmal), number of antiarrhythmic drugs failed, and female sex. Each reflects underlying atrial disease and treatment refractoriness. Higher scores correla

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/6 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

CAAP-AF and CABANA: Explanation and Clinical Context The CAAP-AF score predicts rhythm success following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation by incorporating six baseline parameters: coronary artery disease, left atrial (LA) diameter, age, AF type (persistent vs paroxysmal), number of antiarrhythmic drugs failed, and female sex. Each reflects underlying atrial disease and treatment refractoriness. Higher scores correlate with lower 2-year AF-free survival after ablation.

While the CABANA trial provided robust comparative data between ablation and medical therapy, it did not produce an individualized success prediction model. The CAAP-AF score complements CABANA insights by offering a patient-specific estimation tool to guide expectations and decision-making.

Evidence & references3 primary sources mapped
  1. Source 1

    Winkle RA, Jarman JWE, Mead RH, et al. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(11):2119–2125. Black-Maier E, et al. Heart Rhythm O2.

  2. Source 2

    Jia S, et al. Cardiovascular Diabetology.

  3. Source 3

    Bahnson TD, et al. Heart Rhythm. 2022.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

Pacemaker Requirement Index after TAVR Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

ASD Closure Complication Risk (TEE-based Model) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

ICE Guidance Difficulty Index Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

TriClip Procedural Success (GLIDE) Predictor

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.