Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Device Therapy Scores (ICD, CRT, Pacemaker)
Interactive worksheet3 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

CRT-N Response Probability Calculator

CRT-N Response Probability: Explanation and Clinical Context This nomogram predicts the likelihood of a positive response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) in patients with chronic heart failure. It incorporates three independent factors: Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV), Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis, and Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB). Higher LVESV and myocardial fibrosis percentages, along with

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/3 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

CRT-N Response Probability: Explanation and Clinical Context This nomogram predicts the likelihood of a positive response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) in patients with chronic heart failure. It incorporates three independent factors: Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV), Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis, and Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB). Higher LVESV and myocardial fibrosis percentages, along with the presence of LBBB, are associated with a lower probability of CRT response.

The model has demonstrated high discrimination and calibration, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.865, indicating strong predictive performance.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Lou Y, et al. A nomogram for predicting CRT response based on multi-parameter features. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024;24:123. doi:10.1186/s12872-024-04033-4

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

LVEF-based ICD Classifier

Device Therapy Scores (ICD, CRT, Pacemaker)
Interactive worksheet

LV Lead Position Index (LVLPI) Calculator

Device Therapy Scores (ICD, CRT, Pacemaker)
Interactive worksheet

LV End-Systolic Volume Reduction Index (LVESVRI) Calculator

Device Therapy Scores (ICD, CRT, Pacemaker)
Interactive worksheet

Goldenberg Risk Score (ICD Outcome) Calculator

Device Therapy Scores (ICD, CRT, Pacemaker)
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.