Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Mapped score6 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

EVEREST HF Prognostic Algorithm (EVEREST Score) Calculator

EVEREST HF Prognostic Algorithm — explanation and context The EVEREST score is a 0–18 clinician-rated composite of six symptoms/signs of congestion: dyspnea, orthopnea, fatigue, jugular venous distension (JVD), rales, and pedal edema. Each item is graded 0–3 using the standardized EVEREST grading scale (0 = none; 1 = seldom or mild; 2 = moderate/frequent; 3 = continuous/marked or the numeric JVD/rales/edema threshold

Interactive calculator

Clinical inputs

0/6 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Mapped calculationNumeric option weights were mapped from the audited source form; confirm score use and interpretation against current guidance.
Show formulaSum of the numeric option weights
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

EVEREST HF Prognostic Algorithm — explanation and context The EVEREST score is a 0–18 clinician-rated composite of six symptoms/signs of congestion: dyspnea, orthopnea, fatigue, jugular venous distension (JVD), rales, and pedal edema. Each item is graded 0–3 using the standardized EVEREST grading scale (0 = none; 1 = seldom or mild; 2 = moderate/frequent; 3 = continuous/marked or the numeric JVD/rales/edema thresholds defined in the original paper). The score was developed from the EVEREST trial dataset and has been used in post-hoc analyses to quantify residual clinical congestion at discharge.

In published work a discharge EVEREST score < 2 has been proposed as a practical decongestion target; even small increases (for example ≥1) have been associated with higher subsequent risk of heart-failure events and rehospitalization, and higher scores (for example ≥3) with higher mortality risk over months. This tool reproduces the original EVEREST grading approach to provide a consistent, reproducible clinician-rated congestion score for bedside use.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Andrew P. Ambrosy et al., “Clinical course and predictive value of congestion during hospitalization in patients admitted for worsening signs and symptoms of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: findings from the EVEREST trial.” Eur Heart J. 2013;34:835–843. Nadia Bouabdallaoui et al., “Assessing Splanchnic Compartment Using Portal Venous Doppler and Impact of Adding It to the EVEREST Score for Risk Assessment in Heart Failure.” (Can J Cardiol) 2020 — description and validation context of the EVEREST score. Integrative reviews and guideline summaries describing EVEREST score use and interpretation.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Formula confidence

Structure mapped

Numeric option weights were mapped from the audited source form; confirm score use and interpretation against current guidance.

On this pageCalculator Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

EFFECT Heart Failure Mortality Score Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) Rehospitalization Risk Score Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

DAPT-CHF Subgroup Analysis Index Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

THEMIS-PCI Benefit vs Bleeding Algorithm

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.