Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Heart Failure Scores
Interactive worksheet5 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

INTERMACS Profile Calculator (Advanced HF, LVAD Consideration)

INTERMACS Profile: Explanation and Clinical Context The INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) Profile system is a standardized classification scheme to describe the clinical severity of advanced heart failure. It stratifies patients into seven profiles (1–7) ranging from critical cardiogenic shock to advanced but stable NYHA class III disease. Profiles 1–3 represent patients w

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/5 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

INTERMACS Profile: Explanation and Clinical Context The INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) Profile system is a standardized classification scheme to describe the clinical severity of advanced heart failure. It stratifies patients into seven profiles (1–7) ranging from critical cardiogenic shock to advanced but stable NYHA class III disease. Profiles 1–3 represent patients with high-acuity, end-stage heart failure requiring urgent or elective mechanical circulatory support (MCS) or LVAD implantation, while Profiles 4–5 are stable but symptomatic and often evaluated for elective advanced therapy.

Profiles 6–7 describe patients who remain stable under optimal medical management. The INTERMACS classification has become an essential communication and decision-making tool to guide LVAD timing, transplant eligibility, and expected outcomes. Studies have shown that patients implanted with LVAD at lower INTERMACS profiles (1–2) have higher early mortality, whereas elective implantation (profiles 3–4) yields the best long-term survival.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Young JB, et al. INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: The current picture. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28(6):535–541. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2009.02.015 Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1495–1504. Rogers JG, Aaronson KD, Boyle AJ, et al. Continuous-flow LVAD outcomes across INTERMACS profiles. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(17):1826–1834.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

ESCAPE Risk Model Calculator

Heart Failure Scores
Interactive worksheet

OPTIMIZE-HF Score Calculator

Heart Failure Scores
Score mapped

SHOCK Score Calculator

Heart Failure Scores
Interactive worksheet

COACH Score Calculator

Heart Failure Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.