Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet9 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

NCDR-LAAO Mortality Risk Calculator

NCDR-LAAO Mortality Score: Explanation and Clinical Context The National Cardiovascular Data Registry–Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (NCDR-LAAO) Mortality Risk Model is a validated predictive tool designed to estimate the likelihood of in-hospital mortality following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures. Developed from the comprehensive NCDR LAAO Registry in the United States, which include

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/9 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

NCDR-LAAO Mortality Score: Explanation and Clinical Context The National Cardiovascular Data Registry–Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (NCDR-LAAO) Mortality Risk Model is a validated predictive tool designed to estimate the likelihood of in-hospital mortality following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures. Developed from the comprehensive NCDR LAAO Registry in the United States, which included over 38,000 procedures, this model incorporates key clinical variables such as age, renal function, comorbidities (heart failure, peripheral artery disease, prior stroke, chronic lung disease), dialysis dependence, BMI, and procedural urgency. Each factor contributes independently to procedural mortality risk.

For example, advanced age, renal impairment, and dialysis significantly increase risk, whereas higher BMI (the "obesity paradox") correlates with slightly lower mortality risk. The model provides individualized risk estimates to aid shared decision-making, informed consent, and procedural planning for patients undergoing Watchman or similar LAAO devices. This calculator implements the original logistic regression equation from the NCDR-LAAO study (Amin et al., 2019) for maximal fidelity to the published model.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Amin AP, et al. Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(25):3178–3189. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.031

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

PARTNER Risk Model (TAVR) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Reference

Chronic Total Occlusion Cto J Cto Score Calculator

General
Interactive worksheet

RECHARGE Score Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

STS Score (Aortic or Mitral or Combined) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.