Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet6 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

RECHARGE Score Calculator

RECHARGE Score: Explanation and Clinical Context The RECHARGE (Registry of CrossBoss and Hybrid Procedures) score is a modern angiographic scoring system developed to predict the risk of technical failure in complex percutaneous coronary interventions of chronic total occlusion (CTO-PCI) performed with hybrid techniques. It incorporates six angiographic lesion characteristics: blunt stump, severe calcification, tortu

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/6 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

RECHARGE Score: Explanation and Clinical Context The RECHARGE (Registry of CrossBoss and Hybrid Procedures) score is a modern angiographic scoring system developed to predict the risk of technical failure in complex percutaneous coronary interventions of chronic total occlusion (CTO-PCI) performed with hybrid techniques. It incorporates six angiographic lesion characteristics: blunt stump, severe calcification, tortuosity ≥ 45°, lesion length ≥ 20 mm, diseased distal landing zone, and previous bypass graft on the CTO vessel. Each parameter contributes 1 point (score range 0–6).

Studies found that higher RECHARGE scores are associated with lower procedural success rates (e.g., observed AUC ~0.783 for derivation cohort) and thus may guide procedural planning, operator selection, and patient/institution risk stratification. Because the RECHARGE score was derived in centres using the hybrid algorithm, it reflects a realistic, contemporary practice context and may outperform older scores (such as J-CTO) in hybrid CTO-PCI settings. However, limitations include that the score is purely anatomical/lesion-based (no clinical variables) and was derived in experienced centres, so external validation in less-experienced settings is less robust.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Maeremans J, et al. “Towards a contemporary, comprehensive scoring system for determining technical outcomes of hybrid percutaneous chronic total occlusion treatment: the RECHARGE score.” Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(2):192–202. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27092

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Reference

Chronic Total Occlusion Cto J Cto Score Calculator

General
Interactive worksheet

30-Day Readmission Risk Score After TAVR Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

EWOLUTION Risk Model (Watchman Outcomes) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

OBSERVANT TAVI Mortality Index Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.