Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet9 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

Paravalvular Leak (PVL) Severity Score Calculator

Paravalvular Leak (PVL) Severity Score: Rationale, Calculations, and Clinical Use This tool consolidates validated catheter-based hemodynamic indices to grade PVL severity immediately after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The core metric is the Aortic Regurgitation Index (ARI), defined as ((DBP − LVEDP) / SBP) × 100. Lower values imply greater diastolic run-off into the LV and more severe PVL. In the s

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/9 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

Paravalvular Leak (PVL) Severity Score: Rationale, Calculations, and Clinical Use This tool consolidates validated catheter-based hemodynamic indices to grade PVL severity immediately after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The core metric is the Aortic Regurgitation Index (ARI), defined as ((DBP − LVEDP) / SBP) × 100. Lower values imply greater diastolic run-off into the LV and more severe PVL.

In the seminal work, ARI independently predicted 1-year mortality and complemented echo/angiography; ARI < 25 flagged higher risk. Complementary indices refine risk stratification: the Diastolic Delta (DD) (DBP − LVEDP) with a pragmatic threshold of ≤ 18 mmHg; the heart-rate adjusted DD (HR-DD) calculated as (DD/HR) × 80 with a threshold < 25; and the ARI ratio (post-/pre-deployment ARI), where < 0.60 portends adverse outcomes and predicts the need for post-dilation. When available, the Time-Integrated AR Index (TIARI)—(Diastolic pressure–time integral ÷ LV systolic pressure–time integral) × 100—captures the area between aortic and LV diastolic curves and has shown incremental prognostic and intraprocedural guidance value; < 80 aligns with ≥mild AR on invasive validation.

The calculator reports each index and a conservative composite hemodynamic class (None–Mild, Moderate, Severe) to aid intraprocedural decisions. Final management should integrate prosthesis type and depth, annular eccentricity/calcification, jet location and multiplicity, and multimodality imaging (TEE, quantitative angiography/videodensitometry). Hemodynamic thresholds were derived in mixed-generation valve cohorts; contemporary devices may shift prevalence but the cut-offs remain useful for real-time physiology-guided optimization.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Sinning JM, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1134–1141. ARI = ((DBP − LVEDP)/SBP) × 100; ARI < 25 associated with higher 1-year mortality. Vasa-Nicotera M, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:858–867. Independent validation of ARI performance. van Wely M, et al. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33:923–930. ARI ratio < 0.60 as strongest predictor of 1-year mortality with self-expanding devices. Uebelacker R, et al. J Clin Med. 2023;12:7735. ARI ratio operationalization; peri-procedural prediction of post-dilation; median thresholds; example calculations. Kumar A, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e012430. TIARI improves guidance for post-dilation and predicts survival. ASE/Valve Academic guidance summaries (2019–2024): DD ≤ 18 mmHg; HR-DD < 25; ARI < 25; ARI ratio < 0.60; TIARI < 80 aligns with ≥mild AR.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

EWOLUTION Risk Model (Watchman Outcomes) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

LAA Thrombus Detection Index (TEE-based, CLOTS-AF) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

Catheter Ablation Success Predictor (APPLE & SUCCESS)

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

DEFENSE-PFO Model (Cryptogenic Stroke Benefit) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.