Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet6 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

TWILIGHT-HF Subgroup Analysis Score

Exploratory : Explanation and context The TWILIGHT randomized trial tested whether, among high-risk patients who had completed 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, stopping aspirin and continuing ticagrelor monotherapy reduced clinically relevant bleeding without increasing ischemic events. The trial found a lower rate of BARC 2/3/5 bleeding with ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin, with

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/6 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

Exploratory TWILIGHT-HF Subgroup Analysis Score: Explanation and context The TWILIGHT randomized trial tested whether, among high-risk patients who had completed 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, stopping aspirin and continuing ticagrelor monotherapy reduced clinically relevant bleeding without increasing ischemic events. The trial found a lower rate of BARC 2/3/5 bleeding with ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin, with ischemic outcomes noninferior across the whole study population. Subgroup analyses (preplanned and post-hoc) assessed consistency of the bleeding/ischemic effects across groups defined by age, sex, diabetes, ACS status and other baseline variables.

This tool aggregates a small set of those subgroup variables into a transparent point count to illustrate relative subgroup burden; it is not a replication of a published predictive score and does not produce validated absolute risk predictions.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Mehran R, et al. Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1309–1320. Additional prespecified and subgroup analyses and commentaries: sex and subgroup analyses (see listed publications and meeting presentations).

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

PARADISE-MI Secondary Prevention Algorithm

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Long-term DAPT Benefit Index (PEGASUS DAPT Benefit Calculator)

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

DAPT-CHF Subgroup Analysis Index Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

MADIT-CRT Responder Score Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.