Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Mapped score5 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

CL Score (CTO Lesion Complexity) Calculator

CL Score (CTO Lesion Complexity): Explanation and Clinical Context The CL Score (CTO Lesion Complexity Score) is an angiographic grading system used to predict the procedural success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. It is derived from the validated J-CTO score, first introduced by Morino et al. in 2011, and evaluates five anatomical features that influence the

Interactive calculator

Clinical inputs

0/5 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Mapped calculationNumeric option weights were mapped from the audited source form; confirm score use and interpretation against current guidance.
Show formulaSum of the numeric option weights
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

CL Score (CTO Lesion Complexity): Explanation and Clinical Context The CL Score (CTO Lesion Complexity Score) is an angiographic grading system used to predict the procedural success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. It is derived from the validated J-CTO score, first introduced by Morino et al. in 2011, and evaluates five anatomical features that influence the difficulty of guidewire crossing and procedural completion. Each variable contributes one point if present: blunt stump, calcification, severe tortuosity (>45° bending), occlusion length ≥20 mm, and prior failed CTO attempt.

The total score ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more complex lesions and lower success rates. Based on validation data, procedural success was approximately 88% for easy (score 0), 67% for intermediate (score 1), 42% for difficult (score 2), and 18% for very difficult (score ≥3). This tool helps interventional cardiologists assess case complexity, estimate procedure duration, anticipate the need for specialized equipment or retrograde approach, and counsel patients regarding procedural risks and expectations.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(2):213–221. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.024

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Formula confidence

Structure mapped

Numeric option weights were mapped from the audited source form; confirm score use and interpretation against current guidance.

On this pageCalculator Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

PFO Closure Risk (RoPE) Score Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

LAA Thrombus Detection Index (TEE-based, CLOTS-AF) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

EuroSCORE II (Valvular Surgery Mortality) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

TRILUMINATE TR Severity (5-Grade) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.