Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet5 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

HF-CARB (Chronic Ambulatory HF Risk Model) Calculator

HF-CARB (Chronic Ambulatory Heart Failure Risk Model) — explanation and clinical context This 5-item clinical model (derived from IC-BERG recommendations) evaluates ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure at the clinic by checking five simple features: NYHA class III–IV, clinical signs of congestion, a hospitalization or emergency visit for HF in the previous 12 months, a daily loop diuretic dose ≥40 mg furose

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/5 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

HF-CARB (Chronic Ambulatory Heart Failure Risk Model) — explanation and clinical context This 5-item clinical model (derived from IC-BERG recommendations) evaluates ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure at the clinic by checking five simple features: NYHA class III–IV, clinical signs of congestion, a hospitalization or emergency visit for HF in the previous 12 months, a daily loop diuretic dose ≥40 mg furosemide (or equivalent), and an elevated natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP ≥1,000 pg/mL). Each item counts 1 point; the total score ranges 0–5. In the original cohort (n=1,909), an increasing number of items was associated with progressively higher adjusted hazard ratios for the combined endpoint of death or HF admission (HR 1.47 for 1 item, 2.03 for 2 items, 2.98 for 3 items, 5.07 for 4 items and 7.73 for 5 items, each compared to 0 items).

This makes the score a fast bedside tool to flag patients who may need closer follow-up, therapy optimization, or advanced care planning. For absolute event probability at a fixed timepoint, consult the original Kaplan-Meier curves or cohort baseline hazard because absolute risks depend on baseline incidence in the derivation cohort.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Barge-Caballero E, Barge-Caballero G, Paniagua-Martín MJ, et al. Prognostic value of a model based on IC-BERG recommendations in ambulatory patients with heart failure. REC: CardioClinics. 2022;57:76–84. DOI:10.1016/j.rccl.2021.06.004.

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

EUROMACS Right Ventricular Failure (RHF) Risk Score Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

MADIT-CRT Responder Score Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

ROCKET-AF Heart Failure Subgroup Risk Index

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Interactive worksheet

GWTG-HF Length of Stay (LOS) Prediction Calculator

Cardiovascular Scores, Indexes, And Algorithms
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.