Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Thromboembolic And Anticoagulation Scores
Mapped score8 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

PERC Rule (Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria) Calculator

PERC Rule (Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria): Explanation and Clinical Context The PERC Rule is a clinical decision tool used to identify patients with a very low probability of pulmonary embolism (PE), in whom further diagnostic testing can be safely avoided. It includes 8 criteria: age > 50 years, heart rate > 100 bpm, oxygen saturation < 95%, prior history of PE or DVT, recent surgery or trauma, hemoptysis, es

Interactive calculator

Clinical inputs

0/8 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Mapped calculationNumeric option weights were mapped from the audited source form; confirm score use and interpretation against current guidance.
Show formulaSum of the numeric option weights
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

PERC Rule (Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria): Explanation and Clinical Context The PERC Rule is a clinical decision tool used to identify patients with a very low probability of pulmonary embolism (PE), in whom further diagnostic testing can be safely avoided. It includes 8 criteria: age > 50 years, heart rate > 100 bpm, oxygen saturation < 95%, prior history of PE or DVT, recent surgery or trauma, hemoptysis, estrogen use, and unilateral leg swelling. If a patient meets none of these criteria (PERC negative), the risk of PE is extremely low, and testing such as D-dimer or imaging may be unnecessary in low-risk patients.

If any criteria are positive (PERC positive), further evaluation is warranted based on clinical context.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Kline JA, et al. "Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism." J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(8):1247-1255. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00860.x

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Formula confidence

Structure mapped

Numeric option weights were mapped from the audited source form; confirm score use and interpretation against current guidance.

On this pageCalculator Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index (OBRI) Calculator

Thromboembolic And Anticoagulation Scores
Interactive worksheet

Wells Pulmonary Embolism (PE) Score Calculator

Thromboembolic And Anticoagulation Scores
Interactive worksheet

Wells DVT Score Calculator

Thromboembolic And Anticoagulation Scores
Interactive worksheet

DASH Score Calculator

Thromboembolic And Anticoagulation Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.