Skip to content
cardio.webdr
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart sounds
ToolsSpecialtiesEchoHeart soundsFavoritesPrivate notes
cardio.webdr

Clinical clarity, in seconds. Built for focused decisions—not data collection.

Patient inputs stay on this device.
ExploreAll toolsSpecialtiesEchocardiographyHeart sounds
Your workspaceFavoritesPrivate notesCalculation historyOffline access
PlatformAboutFAQDevelopersFeedbackContact
© 2026 CardioWebdr Clinical support, not a substitute for judgment.PrivacyTermsStorageSupportReport an issue
All tools/Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet16 clinical inputsPatient data not stored

REDUCE Trial PFO Selection Criteria Model (Eligibility RoPE PASCAL)

REDUCE Trial PFO Selection Criteria Model — Explanation and Clinical Context This tool first reproduces the original REDUCE trial eligibility logic (age 18–59 years, cryptogenic non-lacunar ischemic stroke within ≤180 days, and patent foramen ovale with a right-to-left shunt) and screens out key exclusions (atrial fibrillation or another high-risk cardioembolic source, ≥50% relevant arterial stenosis/occlusion, hyper

Interactive worksheet

Clinical inputs

0/16 filled
Inputs stay on this device
Active structured worksheetActive local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.
Clinical contextWhy this tool matters and how to interpret it

Understand the result,
not just the number.

REDUCE Trial PFO Selection Criteria Model — Explanation and Clinical Context This tool first reproduces the original REDUCE trial eligibility logic (age 18–59 years, cryptogenic non-lacunar ischemic stroke within ≤180 days, and patent foramen ovale with a right-to-left shunt) and screens out key exclusions (atrial fibrillation or another high-risk cardioembolic source, ≥50% relevant arterial stenosis/occlusion, hypercoagulable states, and uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension). This mirrors the patient population in whom PFO device closure reduced recurrent ischemic stroke versus antiplatelet therapy alone. To improve precision beyond trial entry criteria, the calculator then estimates causal likelihood using the RoPE score (0–10) and integrates PFO anatomy (large shunt and/or atrial septal aneurysm) via the PASCAL classification.

Patients with RoPE ≥7 and high-risk PFO features typically fall into the “probable” category and show the greatest relative benefit from closure; those with only one of these elements are “possible,” while patients with low RoPE and no high-risk features are “unlikely” and generally derive no net benefit from closure. Results should support, not replace, multidisciplinary decision-making and guideline-directed care.

Evidence & references1 primary source mapped
  1. Source 1

    Søndergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke (REDUCE). N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1033-1042. American College of Cardiology. REDUCE PFO Trial Summary (inclusion/exclusion criteria and outcomes). Stroke-Manual: Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Score and PASCAL classification tables (updated 2025). Sposato LA, et al. Stroke 2024: Net clinical effect across PASCAL strata. ESC Council for Cardiology Practice. Patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke: to close or not to close (2025 update).

Clinical discussionModerated, tool-specific conversation

Loading discussion…

Moderated before publishingNever include patient identifiers.

Workspace mode

Structured worksheet

Active local worksheet: mapped inputs can be completed, validated, copied, saved, and exported on this device. No numerical score is asserted unless its formula is independently reproducible.

On this pageWorksheet Clinical context References Discussion

Privacy by default

Inputs, results, favorites, and notes remain in your browser unless you explicitly export them.

Privacy details
Report formula or content issue
Continue exploring

Related clinical tools

More in this specialty
Interactive worksheet

ICE Guidance Difficulty Index Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

OPEN-CTO Mortality Model (CTO PCI) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

CABANA AF Ablation Success (CAAP-AF) Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Interactive worksheet

STOP-AF Risk Index Calculator

Advanced Structural Intervention Scores
Clinical structure and calculation context point directly to Source 1; additional primary references remain listed for auditability.